P.W.4. Onol Joseph, son of John Lawotum, affirmed that the end up in argument received in order to his father John Lawotum because of the their parent, Daudi Ochan. John Lawotum in turn gave this new home to his Sis Abwok Sapira exactly who lived indeed there to your for some time into respondent. The original appellant, that is a sibling into respondent, following offered off the land in order to Oyet George, father of the next appellant. C.III although earliest appellant would not hands the latest house back into respondent.
Brand new appellants as an alternative proceeded constructing buildings into the home. P.W.5 Odongtoo Samuel, a neighbour, reported that the latest respondent gotten the newest land in argument of their particular late mother.Responding, Oola Peter the first appellant due to the fact D.W.1. affirmed that end up in conflict originally belonged to help you Rwot Daudi Ocan which consequently acquired they of their father Rwot Apete. The fresh respondent’s mom tried haven on household of Rwot in which she received a property from which to take care of their own regional brew company, however, nit the residential property. The brand new respondent was born on that village however, page had partnered at Lugwa. She afterwards came back of her relationship in order to allege and sell away from a portion of the land. D.W.2. Adong Jennifer, next respondent, testified one to during the , their late father Oyet George purchased an excellent 90′ x 300′ part of one’s residential property. The daddy erected a building into end up in the season 2011 ahead of their passing inside she entered on the belongings and first started consuming this building. To the twenty-eight th new respondent joined onto the belongings and you will placed thereon bricks in the form of grave. D.W.step 3. Achol Paska, wife of one’s 3rd respondent, following testified her spouse ordered brand new property she is consuming, calculating 20′ x 65′ out of a-one Lanek Andrew regarding the season 2010. It occupied the new house soundly for another 3 years. During the fourth-year he respondent emerged onto the home and first started growing eucalyptus woods to the homes. She demarcated a barrier and began stating the fresh belongings as hers. She up coming prosecuted their own husband. The road so you can Lamwo comprises new boundary.
Both sides that have closed their respective instances, the legal up coming went along to the locus for the quo in which the borders of residential property was indeed shown to the fresh judge. They prepared a drawing map and you may registered proof on the 3rd appellant which stated that the guy bought the newest land he takes up off a single Lanek Andrew towards the seven th . Other residential property falls under Rwot Daudi Ochan.
Inside the wisdom, the fresh new trial Magistrate unearthed that proof adduced during mediation process by the the fresh new clan in addition to various conclusion of the L.C. Process of law showed that it actually was conceded brand new land belonged towards respondent. The original respondent didn’t focus the fresh ant. The initial appellant by the you to arrangement Perulu kadД±nlarla tanД±ЕџД±n conceded the residential property does maybe not end up in him. The brand new result in dispute hence is one of the respondent. The original respondent is struggling to moving a good term because the property cannot belong to your. The next and you may 3rd appellants did not undertake research before purchase of one to land, and that he’s trespassers with the property. The fresh legal thus supplied bare hands of your ,and the new respondent, approved a permanent injunction up against the appellants and you can awarded the costs of one’s suit on the respondent.
